Legal Opinion
PALACIO DEL MAR HOMEOWNERS ASSN., INC. v. McMahon
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 16, 2009No. G040349, G040412PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IKOLA, J.
Defendant Arnold A. McMahon (McMahon) appeals from a postjudgment order directing him to turn over a domain name to plaintiff Palacio Del Mar Homeowners Association, Inc. (Palacio), to aid the execution of its judgment against McMahon. But Palacio cannot obtain an order directing the turnover of intangible property directly to it. And Palacio failed to show McMahon is in possession of the domain name. We reverse.
FACTS
As protracted litigation 1 snowballed, Palacio obtained a $40,000 judgment against McMahon for attorney fees incurred defending against McMahon’s frivolous…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Imperial Bank v. Pim Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Network Solutions, Inc. v. Umbro International, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Jogani v. JoganiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Lewis v. NeblettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Office Depot, Inc. v. ZuccariniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- CRS Recovery, Inc. v. LaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Specialty Laboratories Inc. v. Advanced Biomedical, Inc. (In re Advanced Biomedical, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Avista Development v. Aldrich CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
- CRS Recovery, Inc. v. LaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.