Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Haynes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1927No. 20737. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondent sued as the administratrix of the deceased, an unmarried man, for the benefit of the father and mother of the deceased, who were alleged to be dependent upon deceased for support during his lifetime, and recovered a judgment for the full amount sued, for in the sum of $8,504.50, which, upon a. motion for a new trial, was conditionally reduced to $5,504.50, which was accepted and judgment entered.

Deceased was engaged in operating a one-ton truck as grocery' delivery man, at the time of his death, was thirty-one years of age, was earning thirty dollars per week, was residing with his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ChurchesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Savage v. DonovanWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. George v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Williams v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Feldtman v. RussakWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Conn v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Franklin v. Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Anderson v. GrandyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Iron v. SauveWashington Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API