Legal Opinion
Sloviaczek v. Estate of Puckett
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1977No. 12111PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*372DONALDSON, Justice.
The parties are in agreement as to the facts of the case. The appeal is brought by appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Sloviaczek, to recover damages for the wrongful deaths of their children. Those deaths occurred in a collision between an automobile owned by one B. H. Young in which those children were riding, and an uninsured automobile driven by an uninsured driver, Dean Russell Puckett. The Young automobile was insured by Safeco.
Three other insurance policies are in issue in this appeal. Safeco had issued a policy to Michael Sloviaczek, one of the deceased children, and Horace…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- Werley v. United Services Automobile AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Prince George's County v. Local Government Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BogartArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- CC Housing Corp. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Unigard Insurance Group v. Royal Globe InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.