Legal Opinion

Weidhaas v. Loew's Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 21, 1942No. 134PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

C. E. CLARK, Circuit Judge.

Defendants appeal from a decision holding that they have infringed plaintiff’s Patent No. 1,756,043, granted April 29, 1930, for a “Stage Curtain or Drop.” The first defendant (who has assumed the entire defense) did not deny that there is infringement if the patent is valid, and the trial and decision were consequently directed solely to the issue of whether or not the claims in the patent represented sufficient advance over prior art as to be worthy of an exclusive right, thus promoting the “Progress of Science and Useful Arts” in the constitutional phrase. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Weidhaas v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schreyer v. Casco Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. R. M. Palmer Company v. Luden's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. Co. v. David Buttrick Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
  4. Connecticut Paper Products, Inc. v. New York Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  5. Ronning Machinery Co. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API