Legal Opinion

Ronning Machinery Co. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 27, 1942No. 7732PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint for want of equity. They alleged infringement of their patents Winsor 2,020,271, Ronning Reissue 19,846, Ronning 1,658,353, Ronning 1,883,403 and Arndt 2,147,631. They rely principally upon Winsor. The court held the Winsor and Ronning Reissue patents not infringed and the others invalid.

The Winsor patent was before the District Court in Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. Beckwith Mach. Co., 25 F.Supp. 73 and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals on appeal in 105 F.2d 941. The trial court there held the patent not…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Blake v. San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garry W. Todd v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  2. Daniel v. O. & M. Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1952
  3. Southwest Industrial Products, Inc. v. Ezee Stone Cutter Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957
  4. Elgen Manufacturing Corp. v. Ventfabrics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
  5. Owens v. Bell & Howell Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API