State ex rel. Flint v. Flint
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Belabor, having appealed from an order in habeas corpus proceedings of the district court for Bamsey county, Otis, J., awarding the custody of his minor child to respondent, served notice of trial de novo in the supreme court under Laws 1895, c. 327.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
Eelator and respondent are husband and wife, who for some time past have been living separate and apart from each other in the city of St. Paul. They have a child of the age of four years, in the custody of its mother, the respondent. Eelator sued out a writ of habeas corpus directed to respondent for the purpose of getting the custody of the child. A trial was thereupon had, and thereafter, on February 16, 1895, the court below filed its order awarding the custody of the child to respondent. From this order, on March 18 last, relator appealed to this court.
Thereafter an act of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Lembke v. BechdelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paramino Lumber Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hodges v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- United States v. AakervikDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1910
- McDonald v. ShortIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Oppegaard v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.