Bomptin Realty Co. v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtF. E. Johnson, J.
The memorandum decision upon the appeal (275 App. Div. 843) permits, and perhaps requires, the inference that the complaint states a cause of action; it was, necessarily, examined to determine the nature of the action which was disputed below. That inquiry must have included such a consideration of its contents that when it was directed that the trial should proceed it should be inferred that it was thereby decided that the complaint states a cause of action at law. The trial now having been concluded, and the plaintiff having abandoned any claim for equitable relief, damages claimed are for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Meruk v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Beugger v. AshleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Hunt v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- Hunt v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Fermenta ASC Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1995
- Serota v. M. & M. Utilities, Inc.Nassau County District Court · 1967
- Bomptin Realty Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
- Deluxe Development of New York, Inc. v. New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998