Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Hunt

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNaught, J.

By agreement of counsel all matters involved in the motion by plaintiff other than whether there should be an award of alimony and counsel fee pending the determination of the action have been eliminated.

The facts claimed by plaintiff are practically undisputed, except as put in issue by the answer denying knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief. The plaintiff and defendant Leslie R. Hunt were married in the year 1904. In or about the year 1909 defendant abandoned the plaintiff and subsequently procured a *365purported divorce in the State of Minnesota, the decree being granted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Galway v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Brush v. LindsayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Sturm v. SturmNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Laudo v. LaudoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clayton v. FarishNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Albert v. AlbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. O'Shaughnessy v. John J. Barrett, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Bomptin Realty Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Gallagher v. GallagherNew York Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API