Legal Opinion
State v. Fermenta ASC Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alan D. Oshrin, J.
PACTS
The defendants and their predecessors have been and are *526the manufacturers and distributors of a herbicide known as Dachtal. Dachtal had been sold in Suffolk County for more than 20 years until 1989. The active ingredient found in Dachtal is dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA). Since 1958 DCPA has been registered for use as a herbicide with the United States Department of Agriculture (later the United States Environmental Protection Agency). Although not now used in Suffolk County, DCPA is registered for use in New York State by the New York…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- McFarlane v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hay v. . the Cohoes CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Swords v. . EdgarNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Acusport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- NAACP v. AcuSport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- State v. Fermenta ASC Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Town of Oyster Bay v. Occidental Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.