Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Defendants seek an order, under Rule 37(a) F.R.Civ.P., directing plaintiffs by one Biberman, who defendants say is plaintiffs’ managing agent, to answer certain questions put to him on an examination before trial. He refused to answer, assigning as one ground the privilege against self incrimination. I have no reason to doubt the bona fides of his claim. By Rule 26(b) the power of the court to order answers is expressly withdrawn where the matter is privileged. I therefore cannot direct that the questions be answered. I can, however, direct plaintiffs, as the parties…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Independent Productions Corporation and Ipc Distributors, Inc. v. Loew's IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's, IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales S.A. v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- General Houses, Inc. v. Marloch Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Ex Parte LevertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Meyers v. Ace Hardware, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982
- Young v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1961
- Independent Productions Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.