Legal Opinion

In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes Cases

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2006PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The following dispositions of currently pending appeals are hereby entered based on our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

I

{¶ 2} Discretionary appeals are accepted in the following cases, the judgments of the courts of appeals are affirmed as to their holdings regarding the unconstitutionality of Ohio’s criminal-sentencing statutes and reversed as to their holdings that modified the defendant’s sentence, and the causes are remanded to the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. Dykes, Unpublished Decision (12-15-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. Cottrell, Unpublished Decision (12-23-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. McDowell, Unpublished Decision (12-29-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. Balwanz, 07 Be 20 (9-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Kendrick v. Parker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. Kendrick, 21790 (11-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API