In Re Disbarment of Isserman
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
April 6, 1953, an order was entered disbarring Isserman from the practice of law in this Court pursuant to Rule 2, par. 5, of this Court’s Rules then in effect. See In re Isserman, 345 U. S. 286. The order of disbarment is now before us on a petition for rehearing. Rule 8 of our present Rules provides that “no order of disbarment will be entered except with the concurrence of a majority of the justices participating.” The petition for rehearing is granted. A majority of the Justices participating do not find ground for disbarment of Isserman. Accordingly, the former order of disbarment is set…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Disbarment of IssermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Sacher v. Association of Bar of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. Charles O. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Walter E. Fisher v. United States of America, Joseph E. Lindquist v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- State v. RussoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- In Re Ronald T. Mitchell, Esq. In Re Stafford A. Hilaire, EsqCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Richard Gladstein v. Hon. J. Frank McLaughlin as Judge of the United States District Court for the District of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.