Legal Opinion

Walter E. Fisher v. United States of America, Joseph E. Lindquist v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1964No. 17045_1PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

These appeals are from convictions of conspiracy to commit mail fraud entered against Walter E. Fisher and Joseph E. Lindquist in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The convictions were entered pursuant to an indictment returned by the Grand Jury which alleged a violation of § 371, Title 18, U.S.C. charging that appellants conspired to commit mail fraud in violation of § 1341, Title 18, U.S.C.

The facts out of which the convictions arose are these. Frank J. Mee, who was convicted with the appellants and whose conviction was affirmed by this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. WipflerIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. United States v. Bill Miles SkillmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  5. Harold Hanger v. United States of America, Gale Mixen v. United States of America, Loretta Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API