Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Roe

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1908No. 15,038; No. 15,037PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Neosho district court; Leander Still-well, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff owned blocks I, J, O and P in Dodd’s addition to the city of Erie. Blocks J and 0 adjoin I and P on the west and are divided into lots. The defendant condemned for railroad purposes a strip of land on the west end of blocks J and 0, whereby the lots were very much shortened. The plaintiff appealed from the award of damages, and in compliance with an order of court filed a petition setting forth his claim. The relief asked was limited to damages for land taken in blocks J and 0 and damages for the injury to the remainder of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lake Koen Navigation, Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McLain Land & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. State v. CooverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hoy v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Salt Lake & U. R. Co. v. SchrammUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Idaho Farm Development Co. v. BrackettIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Saathoff v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction Railroad v. SimonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API