Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Rush

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1959No. Crim. 6554PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

The district attorney of Los Angeles County filed an information wherein defendant was charged in three counts with violations of Penal Code, section 476a, issuing checks without sufficient funds, a felony. It was also charged that defendant suffered two prior felony convictions, one for forgery of a fictitious name and the other for issuing checks without sufficient funds. Defendant pleaded not guilty, and a jury trial was duly waived.

By stipulation the cause was submitted on the transcript of the preliminary hearing with each side reserving the right to offer additional evidence.

After…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. YrigoyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. GriffithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. WilburCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Copeland v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. People v. EddingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. People v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. GuastellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API