Legal Opinion

Brown v. Mudd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 21, 1935No. 22941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants contend that the resale tax deed was invalid and should be set aside upon three grounds. The contentions are:(1) The resale tax deed introduced in this case is invalid for the reason that the notice of such resale did not disclose the name of the owner according to the last tax rolls in the office of the county treasurer, but affirmatively showed the name of a person who had never appeared on the tax rolls and had never had any interest in the property.(2) The resale tax deed is invalid for the reason that a proper return on the original sale for 1926 taxes was not filed by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. Heirs of McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Wilkinson v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swearingen v. McCartanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Bradford v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  3. Brown v. ChaddickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Taylor v. TrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Culbertson v. TropeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API