Legal Opinion

People v. Sayles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1956No. Crim. 5549PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appellant, convicted of possession of narcotics (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500), appeals upon the theory that the only evidence against him was obtained through an unreasonable search and seizure. His counsel makes two points, (1) that a search without a warrant cannot be made where the police have had ample opportunity to procure a search warrant and have failed to do so, (2) that a lawful search cannot be made when section 844 Penal Code is violated— through forcible entry without “having demanded admittance and explained the purpose for which admittance is desired.” Neither contention can be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. De SantiagoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Wyatt v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. SotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. VillanuevaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API