Legal Opinion

People v. Soto

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 4, 1956No. Crim. 3200PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendant was charged with unlawful possession of heroin, and with a prior conviction of the same offense. After being held to answer, defendant moved, under section 995 of the Penal Code, to dismiss the information. The trial court, on the ground that the sole evidence against defendant had been secured illegally, and was, therefore, inadmissible, dismissed the information. The People appeal.

The first question presented is whether or not the superior court properly may pass upon the admissibility of evidence allegedly the product of an unlawful search or seizure in a proceeding under section…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. HoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Lorenzen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. SansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API