Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Pyne

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1973No. 12918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff, Jerry K. Lanier, while driving a yellow cab was injured in a collision with a truck belonging to Gibbons & Reed Construction Company. For his injury and disability he was paid workmen’s compensation totaling $3,301.22 by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Meanwhile, the plaintiff had employed his own attorneys on a one-third contingent fee basis to sue Gibbons & Reed for about $100,000 for negligently causing him injuries and damage, as permitted by Section 35-1-62, U.C.A. 1953.

During the pendency of the action, Liberty Mutual, through its attorneys, intervened,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rogalski v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Prettyman v. Utah State Department of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Worthen v. Shurtleff and Andrews, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Graham v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Munson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United Parcel ServiceUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wilson v. Educators Mutual Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  3. Lanier v. PyneUtah Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API