Worthen v. Shurtleff and Andrews, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice:
■ This is an appeal by The State Insurance Fimd from an order requiring it to pay its proportionate share of costs and attorney’s fees incurred by plaintiff, Bruce T. .Wor-then, in obtaining recovery against defendant, Shurtleff and Andrews, Inc., which benefits both Worthen and the Insurance Fund.
For the purpose of considering the issue here presented, the facts can be regarded thus: On December 2, 1964, the plaintiff Worthen was injured in the course of his employment for H. F. Lowder Milk Co. He received medical expenses and workmen’s compensation totaling…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Norville v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Charles Seligman Distributing Company v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
- Rogalski v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1955
- McConnell v. Commission of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Local Realty Co. v. SteeleUtah Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by15 opinions
- Esquivel v. Labor Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Prettyman v. Utah State Department of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Anderson v. United Parcel ServiceUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Graham v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Draper v. Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.