Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Pyne

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1973No. 12918Published

1Opinion of the Court

508 P.2d 38 (1973)

29 Utah 2d 249

Jerry K. LANIER, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Harold D. PYNE and Gibbons & Reed Company, a corporation, Defendants and Respondents,

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor and Appellant.

No. 12918.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 23, 1973.

Richard H. Moffat, Moffat, Welling, Taylor & Paulsen, Salt Lake City, for intervenor and appellant.

Gayle Dean Hunt, Dwight L. King, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff, Jerry K. Lanier, while driving a yellow cab was injured in a collision with a truck belonging to Gibbons & Reed Construction…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rogalski v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Prettyman v. Utah State Department of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Worthen v. Shurtleff and Andrews, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Graham v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Lanier v. PyneUtah Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API