Legal Opinion
Oxendine v. Kaplan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 6, 2001No. 00-1310PublishedCited by 365 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Horace Oxendine (“Oxendine”) filed a lawsuit pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), on June 30, 1999, alleging that health care professionals (and various others who were later dismissed from the lawsuit 1 ) at the Federal Correctional Institute (“FCI”) in Florence, Colorado, provided him with inadequate and delayed medical care during the course of his incarceration. The district court dismissed Oxendine’s complaint for failure to state a claim on which…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by365 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Gee v. PachecoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Mata v. SaizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Self v. OlivaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Garrett v. StratmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
360 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.