Legal Opinion

Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Milwaukee Gear Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1974No. 234PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

This opinion is limited to answering the three questions asked by the appeal and the motion for review.

Question: Did the bank, as trustee of the W. C. Kohls trust and executor of the estate of Walter C. Kohls, have any right to redemption of the second preferred stock shares by the gear company?

The trial court answered that it did, and we agree. The trial court in its opinion noted that the agreement between the parties provided that the rights of Walter C. Kohls under the agreement shall enure to the benefit of his executor upon his death. It found that, as executor of his estate, the bank…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conrad Milwaukee Corp. v. WasilewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gilman v. GrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Franzen v. Fred Rueping Leather Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Tees v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. O'Connor Oil Corp. v. WarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Excalibur Automobile Corporation. Excalibur Automobile Corporation, Debtor-Appellant v. Roosevelt v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Herbert S. Zim v. Western Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. John Jackman v. Wmac Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Hemad Enterprises, Inc. v. Endurance American Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
  5. Jenna Sondag v. Orthopaedic Speciatists, P.C. and John Hoffman, M.D.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API