Legal Opinion

Tees v. Lee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The appellant is a sole trader doing business under the name of Vitamin Products Company. The respondent was the owner of a distribution organization which he had operated for several years under the name of Vitamin Products Sales Company. He sold this business to the appellant, who agreed to pay therefor $12,000 in $2,000 monthly instalments. In the contract it was agreed that in the event of a default of any monthly payments the total amount was to become due and payable. By the middle of June, 1939, $5,000 had been paid. Plaintiff brought this action to recover the balance of $7,000 now…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. John O'Brien Lumber Co. v. WilkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Kipp v. LaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Beers v. Atlas Assurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Washburn v. DoschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Hampton Plains Realty Co. v. CohenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cordova v. GosarWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In the Matter of Excalibur Automobile Corporation. Excalibur Automobile Corporation, Debtor-Appellant v. Roosevelt v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Johnson v. CurranAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Milwaukee Gear Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API