Legal Opinion
Wanner v. Bissinger
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 29, 1913No. 6098PublishedCited by 9 opinions
At Law. Action by Frank Wanner against Bissinger & Co. On motion to remand.
1Opinion of the CourtBean, District Judge
(orally).
This case was submitted on motion to remand. The action was brought originally in the state court. The defendant, being a nonresident, filed a petition and bond for removal-to this court, and the cause was removed. A motion is now made to remand because no written notice of the filing of the bond and petition was given plaintiff. Section 29 of the Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1095 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1911, p. 142]) re.quires written notice of a petition and bond for removal to be given to the adverse party before the same are filed. Judge Van Fleet, in a very…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Goins v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1912
- United States ex rel. Butterworth & Lowe v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vadner v. VadnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1918
- Lee v. Continental Ins.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1923
- Boyle v. Neisner Bros., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1935
- Arthur v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1914
- Cropsey v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.