Legal Opinion

Lee v. Continental Ins.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided August 11, 1923No. Nos. 970-972PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COCHRAN, District Judge.

These causes are before me on plaintiff’s motions to remand. I am constrained to sustain them on both grounds which have been urged.

The causes were appearances to the April term, 1923, of the Franklin circuit court. That term began Monday, April 2d. The petitions and bonds and notices of purpose to file them, with return thereon showing execution thereof on plaintiff’s attorney, were filed in the office of the clerk of the court at about 8 o’clock p. m. on that day, after adjournment of the court. At defendant’s instance, the judge of the court was present when this…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Construction CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Stone v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Steamship Co. v. TugmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. DaughtrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Insurance Company v. PechnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Flowers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  2. Town of Fairfax, Okl. v. AshbrookDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass'n v. United States Nat. BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1933
  4. Kelley's Adm'r v. AbramDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1937
  5. Ransom v. Sipple Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API