Legal Opinion

Morris v. Perpich

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1988No. C9-87-1557PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellants R. Kathleen Morris, Stephen Doyle and Doyle & Michales brought this action to recover $162,427.80 in attorney’s fees and expenses incurred in the representation of Morris by Doyle and Doyle & Michales. Appellants claim the state, Governor Rudy Perpich, and Scott County are liable for attorney’s fees associated with Morris’ representation before the Governor’s special commission to consider a petition for removal from her position as Scott County Attorney. Against Scott County, appellants claim the county agreed to pay the attorney’s fees in the removal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Minnesota State Zoological BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. The Alexander Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Hampton v. HamptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marine Iron & Shipbuilding Co. v. City of Duluth (In Re Marine Iron & Shipbuilding Co.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  2. Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Minnesota Central Railroad v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. PLYMOUTH FOAM PRODUCTS v. City of Becker, Minn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  5. CITY OF GENESEO. v. Utilities PlusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API