Legal Opinion

State v. Kelly

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 2014No. 14-KA-241PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge.

| ^Defendant appeals his convictions and sentences for second-degree murder. Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s admission of one victim’s statement made shortly after he was shot under the “excited utterance” exception to the hearsay exclusionary rule. Defendant further claims on appeal that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel as the result of a conflict of interest that arose when his counsel was required to cross-examine a former client whose testimony was compelled by the state at trial.

For the reasons provided herein, we find that…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. GarnerColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. State v. WalkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. GarnerColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State of Louisiana Versus Jacob v. RobinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API