Legal Opinion

Tedder v. Home Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1925No. 6 Div. 977PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

As observed by counsel, the pleadings in this cause are multitudinous, but the real issues to he tried were few and simple.

The undisputed evidence showed that plaintiff violated two provisions of the “iron safe clause” in his insurance policy, in that he kept no hooks and no complete records of his business transactions, and in that such records or memoranda as he kept were not kept in a fireproof safe, or at some other place not exposed to a fire that would destroy the store building. Plaintiff seems to have adopted, in a very imperfect way, what is known as the McKaskey register system of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Queen Insurance v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Georgia Home Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Georgia Home Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Indemnity Company of America v. PughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. The Charles Stores, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Company, the Charles Stores, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API