Millar v. Hilton
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by Charles Millar against Francis A. Hil- . ton and I. G. Hilton upon a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff against Francis A. Hilton and for defendant I. G. Hilton on a verdict directed by the court. Plaintiff and defendant F. A. Hilton bring er- . ror.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
This appeal involves a judgment, in an action begun in the Wayne county circuit court, May 9, 1912, upon a promissory note dated at Toronto, Ontario, November 20, 1902, due in three months, made and signed by defendant Francis A. Hilton, payable to the order of I. G. Hilton, his wife, at Molson’s Bank, Toronto. Plaintiff became owner of the ’note when, or shortly after, it was made, and discounted it at Molson’s Bank. When it became due the bank protested it for nonpayment, and, having indorsed the same, plaintiff was subsequently obliged to pay the amount due upon it to the bank, again…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Belden v. BlackmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Douglass v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Bulger v. RocheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1831
- Blackburn v. Blackburn's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rubin v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Walton School of Commerce v. StroudMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Vanderbush Sheet Metal Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Transit Bus Sales v. Kalamazoo Coaches, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- In Re Schafer's BakeriesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.