Legal Opinion

Donawitz v. Danek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In a medical malpractice action, defendant Dudley F. Hawkes appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, *680Nassau County, dated November 18, 1975, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to direct the attachment of appellant’s liability insurer’s contractual obligation to defend and indemnify him. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. This court is again faced with but another outgrowth of the Seider v Roth (17 NY2d 111)—Simpson v Loehmann (21 NY2d 305) principle which permits a plaintiff to obtain in rem jurisdiction over a defendant by attachment of the latter’s liability insurer’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seider v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Silver v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Simpson v. LoehmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Vaage v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Seligman v. TuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christovao v. Unisul-Uniao de Coop. Trans. de Tomate do sul do Tejo, S.C.R.L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API