Legal Opinion
Christovao v. Unisul-Uniao de Coop. Trans. de Tomate do sul do Tejo, S.C.R.L.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on August 4, 1976, affirmed, on the ground of forum non conveniens for the reasons stated by Tierney, J., at Special Term. Respondents shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Silverman and Lane, JJ.; Lupiano and Birns, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum by Lupiano, J.: While I concur that dismissal of the complaint would be appropriate on the ground of forum non conveniens (CPLR 327) assuming jurisdiction had been properly obtained, examination of the record mandates the conclusion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Silver v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Kramer v. VoglNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Haar v. Armendaris Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Bereswill v. YablonNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- De Cedeno v. MercantileNew York Supreme Court · 1977