Legal Opinion
Seligman v. Tucker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 9, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Witmer, J. P.
The sole issue presented on the appeals in these two cases is whether New York courts must give full effect to a provision in a casualty insurance policy issued in another State that the insurer shall have no obligation thereunder in a State where the presence of an insurer-obligor provides the sole basis of jurisdiction over the insured.
In the Seligman case plaintiff Marcia Seligman is a resident of Erie County, New York. An automobile owned by defendant, Norman E. Tucker, of the District of Columbia and operated by his son, Amos W. Tucker (then of Suffolk County, Massachusetts,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Minichiello v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chrapa v. JohncoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Donawitz v. DanekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Durgin v. BurnetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976