Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2017No. 2016-1829PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, J. Greg Miller, of New Philadelphia, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0046855, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1990. On June 29, 2016, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Miller with professional misconduct arising from his efforts to fraudulently conceal his failure to timely record a deed, mortgage, and assignment of rents following the sale of real property.

{¶ 2} A panel of the Board of Professional Conduct considered the cause on the parties’ consent-to-discipline agreement. See Gov.Bar R. V(16).

{¶ 3} In their consent agreement, the parties stipulate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FumichOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Farris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. HebenOhio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. VillarrealOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Oviatt.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Christensen and Kluesener (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API