Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Oviatt.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2018No. 2018-0537PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

*586 {¶ 1} Respondent, Richard Ahlman Oviatt, of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0025563, was admitted to the practice of law in 1967.

{¶ 2} In June 2017, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Oviatt with making improper statements impugning the integrity of judicial officers, breaching the confidentiality of the disciplinary-grievance process, and other professional misconduct. Oviatt denied the charges, and the matter proceeded to a hearing before a three-member panel of the Board of Professional Conduct. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the panel dismissed one alleged…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GaulOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. ShimkoOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. HartwellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. WestOhio Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Morton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. VillarrealOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Davis v. YuspehOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API