Disciplinary Counsel v. Oviatt.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
*586 {¶ 1} Respondent, Richard Ahlman Oviatt, of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0025563, was admitted to the practice of law in 1967.
{¶ 2} In June 2017, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Oviatt with making improper statements impugning the integrity of judicial officers, breaching the confidentiality of the disciplinary-grievance process, and other professional misconduct. Oviatt denied the charges, and the matter proceeded to a hearing before a three-member panel of the Board of Professional Conduct. Based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the panel dismissed one alleged…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Disciplinary Counsel v. GaulOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Disciplinary Counsel v. ShimkoOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. HartwellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. WestOhio Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Morton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. VillarrealOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- Davis v. YuspehOhio Court of Appeals · 2023