In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This multidistrict litigation involves allegations that defendant egg producers and trade groups conspired to restrict the supply of eggs in this country. After the Defendants successfully moved to partially dismiss the Second Amended Complaint to the extent the claims for damages fell outside the applicable statutes of limitations, the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs filed Third and Fourth Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaints. Predictably, the Defendants now seek to partially dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Edward Arthur v. Maersk, Inc. D/B/A Maersk Line Ltd. Dyn Corp. Technical Services D/B/A Dyn Marine Services the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Lorenz v. CSX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- CARTISSER v. WEST ALLEGHENY SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- HURLEY v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- SHAIKH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY - DEPARTMENT OF BANKING & INSURANCE, DIVISION OF INSURANCEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- SHAIKH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY - DEPARTMENT OF BANKING & INSURANCE, DIVISION OF INSURANCEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024