Legal Opinion

Ko v. Royal Globe Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 24, 1978No. 5068-1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

The plaintiff, Eugene Ko, appeals from the summary judgment of dismissal of his complaint against his insurer, the defendant Royal Globe Insurance Company. The plaintiff asserts that if the damages incurred by an injured party exceed the amount of the tort-feasor's coverage, the injured party may look to the uninsured motorist provision in his own policy for additional coverage. Prior to argument of the motion, counsel for the parties entered into a stipulation as to the essential facts as follows:

1. That on or about November 21, 1973, Norma Ko was fatally injured in an automobile collision…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Simonette v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Palisbo v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Detrick v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  5. Smiley v. Estate of ToneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finney v. FARMERS INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. Ziegelmayer v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  3. Romero v. West Valley School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Ko v. Royal Globe InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API