Maxey v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
W.H. “Dub” ARNOLD, Chief Justice.
Louise Maxey appealed stice. Compensation Commission holding that she was not. permanently and totally disabled, but that she was entitled to benefits for a 35 percent wage-loss disability. The Second Injury Fund cross-appealed, arguing that the Commission erred in awarding appellant wage-loss benefits on a scheduled injury. Appellee Tyson Foods took the position that the Commission did not err in finding that appellant failed to prove permanent and total disability, but did not address the Second Injury Fund’s argument.
The Court of Appeals disagreed with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- White v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Deffenbaugh Industries & Travelers Insurance v. AngusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Burlington Industries v. PickettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Woodall v. Hunnicutt ConstructionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dinkins v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Collins v. Excel Specialty ProductsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Estridge v. Waste ManagementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Bearden v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Whitlatch v. Southland Land & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.