Legal Opinion
Cone Mills Corp. v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 2, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 2439PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
Plaintiff is a licensee under two patent agreements with defendant. Defendant has charged plaintiff with violation of the agreements by using the patents and failing to pay royalties. Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment it has complied with the patent license agreements and owes no money. The complaint prays defendant be enjoined from threatening suit for plaintiff finishing certain fabrics and textiles, etc., under defendant’s patents ; and plaintiff denies it has violated the license agreements, claiming no royalties are due defendant.
The present applications are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
- American Cyanamid Company v. Hercules Powder CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1959
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. Celanese Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
- Green v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. & General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1994