Legal Opinion
American Cyanamid Company v. Hercules Powder Company
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 2, 1962No. Civ. A. 2248PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.
This is an action arising under the-patent laws of the United States and at this stage of the proceedings important questions concerning discovery are raised. Plaintiff, American Cyanamid' Company is suing the defendant, Hercules Powder Company, for infringement of its Daniel Patent No. 2,595,935, alleging that plaintiff’s rights are infringed by Hercules’ sale of resin products under its subsequently obtained Keim Patents Nos. 2,926,116 and 2,-926,154. Both parties have made motions under Rule 34 for the production -of specific documents in the other’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- City of Philadelphia v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Natta v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.