Legal Opinion
Hayslip v. Speed Check Company
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 10, 1958No. 20214PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Presiding Justice.
Hayslip sues as assignee of Black. The instrument sued upon provides that Hayslip covenants to buy a one-half interest in the patent in question for $15,000, which is to be paid in one year from the date of the instrument. In the meantime, Hayslip is to pay Black a royalty of 2 1/2 °fo on all tags sold, and title is to .remain vested in Black “and this agreement shall in said interim be construed as a license from party of the first part to party of the second part to manufacture and sell pursuant to said patent.” The instrument executed by Black on January 17, 1958,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Couch v. CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Marshall v. MeansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Security Feed & Seed Co. of Thomasville, Inc. v. NeSmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Morehead v. AyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
- Generali — U. S. Branch v. Southeastern Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- In Re Estate of SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Health Horizons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Health Horizons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003