State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STUART, Justice.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) petitioned this Court for certiorari review of the Court of Civil Appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s judgment ordering State Farm to pay an attorney fee based on a common-fund theory for the recovery of the moneys advanced by State Farm to James Ross Pritchard, Jr., pursuant to Lambert v. State Farm, Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 576 So.2d 160 (Ala. 1991). We reverse and remand.
Facts and Procedural History
Pritchard sued Broderick McCants, State Farm (Pritchard’s uninsured/under-insured-motorist (“UIM”)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex Parte GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Ex Parte Toyota Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Lambert v. State FarmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Driver v. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Owners Insurance Company v. BlackDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PritchardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016