Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 22, 2016No. 2130989Published

1Opinion of the Court

On Remand, from the Alabama Supreme CouH

2Per curiam

This court’s prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 207 So.3d 734, *741739 (Ala.2016). In compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause with instructions to the trial court to enter a judgment denying the request of James Ross Pritchard, Jr., that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company pay a pro rata share of the attorney fees incurred by Pritchard “for the recovery of moneys advanced by State…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lambert v. State FarmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PritchardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API