Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Flotill Products, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1947No. Civ. 7359PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover an indebtedness on a common count for services rendered at defendant’s oral and special request. Defendant answered and filed a cross-complaint alleging that defendant and plaintiff entered into oral contracts whereby plaintiff agreed to furnish trucking service for the hauling of peaches and tomatoes to defendant’s canneries, and alleging damages by reason of plaintiff’s breach of said contracts. Plaintiff admitted execution and alleged full performance of the agreement to haul peaches, but denied that an oral agreement to haul tomatoes as charged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Nevills v. Moore Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Andrews v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Wold v. League of the Cross of the Archdiocese of San Francisco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Haumeder v. LipsettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Warner Bros. International Television Distribution v. Golden Channels & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Goad v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API