Legal Opinion
State v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 1, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4815PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
The state brought this special action to challenge the trial court’s denial of its motion pursuant to Rule 7.2(b), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., to have the real party in interest taken into custody and held without bond pending sentencing. Because the state was without a remedy by appeal and because we believed the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in denying the motion, we ordered that the real party in interest be taken into custody pending sentencing, with this opinion following to supplement that order.
The real party in interest was found…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Padilla v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Buckner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Summerour v. CartrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Greer Motor Vehicle Operator License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- State v. VincentConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. SaenzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. BarashAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.