Legal Opinion

People v. Goldston

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2004No. Docket 122364PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C.J.

In this case, we must determine whether to recognize a “good-faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. In United States v Leon, 468 US 897; 104 S Ct 3405; 82 L Ed 2d 677 (1984), the United States Supreme Court interpreted US Const, Am IV and adopted a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule as a remedy for unreasonable searches and seizures. Under Leon, the exclusionary rule does not bar the admission of evidence seized in reasonable, good-faith reliance on a search warrant ultimately found to have *526been defective. The exclusionary rule in Michigan is a judicially created remedy that is…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. People v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. FrazierMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Paige v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. TierneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. People of Michigan v. Lovell Charles SharpeMichigan Supreme Court · 2018

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API