People v. Goldston
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C.J.
In this case, we must determine whether to recognize a “good-faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. In United States v Leon, 468 US 897; 104 S Ct 3405; 82 L Ed 2d 677 (1984), the United States Supreme Court interpreted US Const, Am IV and adopted a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule as a remedy for unreasonable searches and seizures. Under Leon, the exclusionary rule does not bar the admission of evidence seized in reasonable, good-faith reliance on a search warrant ultimately found to have *526been defective. The exclusionary rule in Michigan is a judicially created remedy that is…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- People v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. FrazierMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Paige v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. TierneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- People of Michigan v. Lovell Charles SharpeMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.