Legal Opinion

Priestley v. Priestley

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1997No. 96-SC-271-DG, 96-SC-803-DGPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Justice.

Upon a jury verdict, Brenda J. Priestley, appellee/cross-appellant (hereinafter “appel-lee”), was adjudged to have breached her fiduciary duties with respect to her management of the assets of Rodman G. Priestley. On appeal, the Court of Appeals determined sua sponte that the decisive issue was whether appellants/cross appellees (hereinafter “appellants”), the children of Rodman G. Priestley, had standing to assert claims for breach of such fiduciary duties. Answering in the negative, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and dismissed appellants’…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wengler v. Druggists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Mitchell v. HadlKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Young v. J.B. Hunt Transportation, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  5. HealthAmerica Corp. of Kentucky v. Humana Health Plan, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Elk Horn Coal Corp. v. Cheyenne Resources, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Scott v. Forcht Bank, NACourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
  3. Wabner v. BlackKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ingram v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002
  5. Karem v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API