Legal Opinion

Karem v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 21, 2012No. 2010-SC-000375-DGPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by Justice SCHRODER.

The issue in this appeal is whether a district court acted outside the scope of its jurisdiction when it issued an order requiring a guardian to provide all financial records related to a court-ordered accounting and to make restitution to a guardianship account. Because the district court is granted exclusive jurisdiction to manage and settle guardianship accounts as provided under KRS 387.520, the District Count was acting soundly within its jurisdiction and the order entered by the Court of Appeals requiring the circuit court to enter a writ of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Grange Mutual Insurance Co. v. TrudeKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Buder v. Sartore ex rel. BuderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Ally Cat, LLC v. ChauvinKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Priestley v. PriestleyKentucky Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. James T. Scatuorchio Racing Stable, LLC v. Walmac Stud Management, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
  2. Dunn v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
  3. Giese v. GieseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
  4. Amy Burns v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
  5. Amy Burns v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API