Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Cates

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 19, 2002No. 2000-CA-002481-MRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMBERTON, Judge.

This case involves questions of law and fact related to alleged violations of fiduciary duties. William Cates, Executor of the will of Pius Ingram, filed this action alleging that John Ingram, as attorney-in-fact for Pius Ingram, wrongfully made gifts from funds owned by Mr. Ingram to himself and his sister. The trial court found that the claim was not time-barred and entered summary judgment in favor of Cates. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

Cates and Pius Ingram became acquainted in the 1970s, and in 1988, Mr. Ingram, who at the time was in his eighties,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Priestley v. PriestleyKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Wabner v. BlackKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Harding v. Kentucky River Hardwood Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Halcomb v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ping v. Beverly Enterprises, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Middleton v. SampeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
  3. Bariteau v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Rich & Rich Partnership v. Poetman Records USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010
  5. Martello v. SantanaDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API