Legal Opinion
ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Apex Alarm, LLC
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 9, 2006No. Civil Case 05-cv-02523-LTB-OESPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
The defendants, Apex Alarm, LLC (“Apex”), Keith Nellesen, Todd Pederson, and Chance Allred, move for dismissal for improper venue. The motion is adequately briefed and oral argument would not materially aid its resolution. For the reasons stated below, I GRANT the motion. Earlier, I held the motion in abeyance pending supplemental briefing. A brief recitation of the history is in order.
The plaintiff, ADT Security Services, Inc. (“ADT”) entered into a dealer agreement (“Dealer Agreement”) with RS & I Security, Inc. (“RS & I”), not a party to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Terra International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Mississippi Chemical Corporation, a Mississippi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Hipage Co., Inc. v. Access2Go, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Gita Sports Ltd. v. SG Sensortechnik GmbH & Co. KGDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2008
- D.E. Frey Group, Inc. v. FAS Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2008
- Fitness Together Franchise, L.L.C. v. EM Fitness, L.L.C.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020
- McNees v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020